Skip to main content

Infinity and its relation to good and evil

http://www.sufism.org/society/articles/GoodAndEvil.htm


Q: One thing that helps me is that the Qur'an and hadith have lots of references to timelessness. Where God gives time, and this infinity defines not just the linear time that we're on, seen and unseen, but beyond the seeming events, and infinity includes all possibilities. So instead of just our lives being a linear sequence of events, some good and some bad, it's really a multi-dimensional continuum of all possibilities. We just happen to be sitting in one arbitrary spot. It's almost like you have a picture that's black and white. And it's not like there's presence and absence of good in one particular spot, and it just happened to reach an uncomfortable spot. It's not important whether it's opposite is included or not in the picture. I don't know if this is making sense. But the infinity completely negates good and evil.

William Chittick: I would, in your discussion, I would object to the word "arbitrary." It's a very un-Islamic idea. There's nothing arbitrary.

Q: It could be this, it could be that…

WC: No, it couldn't. It couldn't. It could not. That's precisely the point. It's taqdir, it's God, it's measured out. Measured out exactly the way it happens. That's the whole point. Don't say [lau], don't say if. Say [taqdir]. [Qadar]. God has measured it out exactly that way. He has destined it. This is the way it had to happen. It's why the prophet said: The good is in what happens. Whatever happens is the good. There is nothing arbitrary about anything, except in our perception of things. The nafs has this perception which sees things arbitrarily because it can't grasp the whole picture. But the man of spirit sees that everything is in its proper place.

Comments

  1. Anonymous2/22/2006

    Excellent article. MashaAllah, may Allah be pleased with Rumi and the teacher in the article. I am interested in the concept of the relativity and apparently-calculated approach of Evil discussed in this text. It provides much food for thought.

    Here are two parts that I find myself questioning:

    "In conclusion, to will evil is only reprehensible when it is willed for its own sake. But when it is willed for the sake of a good, then it is not reprehensible."

    This seems to be a dangerous concept, no? It's the idea that evil based on good intentions is not reprehensible. Perhaps, in the eyes of God, this may be correct (wAllahu Alim). However, it just doesn't sit well with me.

    "He knows we can only know and love Him if we we're faced with evil." Is this true? I wonder what the sources are for this type of conclusion. I'm sure there are those who are not faced with evil and "know and love Him". Remember, the three mind types described by Imam Jawziyah (May Allah bless him): repentance, patience, and gratefulness. While "evil" falls into patience and repentance, I feel that it has no place in gratefulness (except to maybe express thankfulness for the absence of evil).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sadia2/25/2006

    COnsider this very typical example: If a woman endures emotional abuse in a relationship (abuse is evil), but she chooses to remain in the relationship for the sake of her children (children's emotional stability, good), then the woman is allowing evil to continue (though, let's assume she has the power to leave, etc.) for the sake of a good (i.e. her children).
    the intention here is good, but if the woman's well being means anything, then she should leave. or so says oprah.

    the idea is really that evil exists so that we can recognize the bounties and goodness of Allah talla.

    and how does evil fall into patience and repentence?

    i think i want to give you rights to writing on the sadiablog. i think you should have this power.

    i had a conversation about gujurat today at work. apparently their food is sweet and sour at the same time. oh the excitement!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

And Today I was Called an Intellectual Whore

Today I was called a intellectual whore. I was told that all i want to do is intellectually screw people because what I like most about people are their ideas, experiences and thoughts. I have shown little regard for emotions, and sentimentality and for the UMPTH time this year, I find myself saddened by the loss of a friend. Here's his top 10 of most (im)memorable quotes: 1. "You're like Sex in the City, minus the sex." [Mindless stupidity is the implication] 2. "I am a warm person. You're not" 3. [paraphrase] I am a very sensitive person. I can't have you constantly hurting my feelings. 4. "I don't respect you" 5. "I am a generous person" 6. "We can't be friends, Sadia." 7. "You are emotionally crippled" 8. "What you need is a wall." 9. "I don't mean to hurt you." 10. "You're an intellectual whore." And the best question of today, and of the week perhaps, is when ...
3 comments
Read more

Why Not Friendship (Revised)- Repost

It is difficult to be merely a friend to a boy who seems more suitable as a husband than a friend. To reduce a potential life partner to a friend is immature and selfish. Friendship is the not the greatest type of relationship, but it is the safest. Friendship allows you to be intimate without the messiness of other things, like physical attraction, etc. Between friends, there is a warm permanence, a fuzziness that can be called appreciation and gratitude. There is also comfort and trust. Friendship is great if only for the possibility that one can know the beauty of another human being. The possibility of that is worth the difficulty of all else. But sometimes friendship is not enough. Sometimes, to reduce someone to friend when he should be much more is an affront to the opportunity God has presented before you. It is like saying to him, I know that we are amazing together, but we should be friends because I am a dumbass. To reduce him to friend also precludes the possibility of love...
7 comments
Read more

Amina Wadud and Dr. Umar Faruq Abd-Allah: Gender, Quran, A reading

If you really are that ambitious, here is a 2660 word essay submitted late for your enjoyment. Gendering the Qu’ran: Analysis of Amina Wadud’s Qur’an and Women (A Draft) “How can ideas that transcend gender be expressed in gendered language?” In her Qur’an and Woman, Amina Wadud asks a hard but uniquely modern question of the timeless text of the Qur’an (xii). She contextualizes the language and ideas of the Qur’an with a model of hermeneutics that is characterized by standard notions to context, grammar, and Weltanschauung, or world view. Rather than simply extend medieval exegesis, Wadud returns to the original text of the Qur’an in order to derive the fundamentals concerning Muslim women, their roles, and responsibilities. She does this through an analysis that is critical of both the cultural context of revelation, as well as the context of classical tafsir, or interpretations of the Qur’an, given that the androcentrism of seventh-century Arabia still pervades society today. She pr...
4 comments
Read more