Skip to main content

In the Beginning

Bismillah.

I read an article about the ever-expanding world of bloggers in Fortune Magazine several months ago. Promising myself that I would never join this narcissistic world, today marks the beginning of my broken promise. I broke my promise largely by accident. I was trying to make a post on Muniba's blog when I was diverted into creating my own blog. Damn technology.

I've always kept journals but the thought of having others read my private thoughts, feelings, and insights seems troubling. In high school, when this internet craze over livejournal and similar programs began, I could not understand the motivation for sharing so much of yourself in an internet world in which you exercised no control. Not only do I have little control over who reads my blogs, I can't even grasp who my audience is exactly. Who am I writing for? What motives do people have for reading about me? I read another friend's blog one day, but only out of pity because no one comments on his unoriginal insight. I do not want to be the person that says, Read my Blog. (Sorry Mubashar, but you are endearingly pathetic)

Human interaction would naturally be disinclined (might not be a word) to the isolationist world of blogging. I know there is a large internet community of supporters, but I am sure I would much rather sit at a coffee shop somewhere in the village, looking at you, laughing, smiling, drinking, while you tell me about the things you've done and read and seen. I would like to read your face as you listen to me, as I tell you about my angsts and fears and hopes and stories. I would much rather do that than sit facing my computer, typing my thoughts onto a screen that is accessible to all, even to those I don't want to share with.

My goals ultimately for Sadia's Blog are: largely personal development, specifically (1) to open myself up to technology and overcoming my fear of The Internet; (2) To use my blog in lieu of my written journal (my handwriting has deteriorated over the years and is hardly legible, even to me); (3) To organize my thoughts more efficiently. In a word, narcissism.

What you might gain from reading about me, I cannot fathom. But I hope you enjoy what I offer of myself.

Comments

  1. Oh Sadia, coming here to see more of your inner monoloques and ideas is more than reason enough to go online for me :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. what happens when there are many friends whom you would love to share that coffee shop moment with and don't have the time, or they are so distant from where you are that these feeble means of connection are the only things that keep you from losing touch with one another? i think in instances such as those, blogs, emails, IM's, etc. all help... plus sometimes a few minutes or even hours in the coffee shop can't open up inner thoughts as much as writing can... you're a lit major- you of all people should know the importance of written words.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sometimes human face-to-face interaction is mediocre. Many times, in fact, after the initial spark, smile, handshake, it becomes difficult to keep up a correspondence unless the other party is inspiring, challenging, great enough. I like to think we get better with time. Relationships, friendships develop and grow over time but somehow, it becomes more difficult to make them grow and develop, especially if you want brilliant conversation all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6/29/2005

    you can't stop the machine now. imagine life in 10 years. unless the processes of capitalism implode or we all die of cancer, the internet will be ... god.


    it was a beautiful concept you know. it started out like television started. a public medium for normal folks to use, empowerment! but everything eventually gets conqured and now look at teh state of public television, if they can manage securing long-term funding at all. the internet was supposed to be the ultimate in public, free, information. the internet ..is a godamn socialist. unix / linux / open source!! those have ideals! think abou it. i lurve applying the common's theory to the internet. i believe it. < / end tangent >


    now i dont know how much of blogging is a transfering of your emotions from "real" life to the screen. i always get emails saying things like "i didn't know the internet wasn't 'real life'"


    boo. i've been co-opted. i know that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Not Friendship (Revised)- Repost

It is difficult to be merely a friend to a boy who seems more suitable as a husband than a friend. To reduce a potential life partner to a friend is immature and selfish. Friendship is the not the greatest type of relationship, but it is the safest. Friendship allows you to be intimate without the messiness of other things, like physical attraction, etc. Between friends, there is a warm permanence, a fuzziness that can be called appreciation and gratitude. There is also comfort and trust. Friendship is great if only for the possibility that one can know the beauty of another human being. The possibility of that is worth the difficulty of all else. But sometimes friendship is not enough. Sometimes, to reduce someone to friend when he should be much more is an affront to the opportunity God has presented before you. It is like saying to him, I know that we are amazing together, but we should be friends because I am a dumbass. To reduce him to friend also precludes the possibility of love...
Malcolm Gladwell. "Getting In: The Social Logic of Ivy Leage Admissions" http://www.gladwell.com/2005/2005_10_10_a_admissions.html Major themes: 1. Passion is a significant contributor to success. 2. High intelligence means little without discipline and passion. "Bowen and Shulman write about the characteristics that make athletes more coveted by Ivy League schools: One of these characteristics can be thought of as drive--a strong desire to succeed and unswerving determination to reach a goal, whether it be winning the next game or closing a sale. Similarly, athletes tend to be more energetic than the average person, which translates into an ability to work hard over long periods of time--to meet, for example, the workload demands placed on young people by an investment bank in the throes of analyzing a transaction. In addition, athletes are more likely than others to be highly competitive, gregarious and confident of their ability to work well in groups (on teams). I ...

Re: Your Inquiries

"You confuse yourselves with your actions, even with your thoughts. You barely understand that in order to be, it should not be necessary to act, and that the world changes you far more than you change it." (Malraux, The Temptation of the West, 1961 ) The world consists of wonderful people who enter and exit your life. When you let them enter, your breaths seem more thoughtful, your behaviors more scrutinized, your ideas challenged, and sometimes your brain orgasms from happiness. But when these individuals leave, you experience equally significant things like confusion and hurt. It seems okay to let someone in, someone trustworthy, good, honest, and not concern yourself with the end. As things exist in your mind, there is no harm. Intellectual promiscuity, then, is not so bad. To have intimate, intelligent conversations into the morning is not troubling, either. Sometimes when good people enter, it is not necessary to act, or specifically to resist. When people enter, their ...