Skip to main content

Pathetic Fallacy

My friend Roman and I were spilling the contents of our brains last night instead of studying for exams. It was a more fulfilling experience anyway, to sit and discuss the philosophy of your own mind than to the read the philosophies of others, or in his case, a financial (statement?) analysis textbook. I do believe I am more interesting than his textbook.

One of the many things discussed was the notion of fatality, specifically my irrational belief that things get better because God wills it to get better; or classes go as they do because I relinquish a nonexistent work ethic to chance (or God); or people walk away from me because that is how it was supposed to be; or I will marry X because he was prescribed to me. Today in Harper's I found an interesting word to describe this phenomenon

PATHETIC FALLACY: the anthropomorphic projection of human feeling or volition onto nature

Why does God have all these human attributes--anger, disapproval, e.g.--when He is Transcendent over all things? My explanation: because it is the only way we can know something, through analogy, through similes, and metaphors, through our experiences in this world. Yet, when it comes to experiencing the world, so much of the world is prohibited, so much of it is prescribed the "no-touch" policy. Why is this the case? And what is the rational foundation for faith? Other than the name "Kirkegaard"--I stumble trying to explain to him.

This is what people of faith do: they relinquensh a lot of human agency. God helps those that help themselves. Yes, there's that proverb, but in times of stress, frustration, confusion, God will be played like a ace of spade in a game of spades. What is faith? It is a type of belief. What is belief? It is not knowledge. What is Knowledge? Please consult Plato and Aristotle.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12/18/2005

    assalaamu alaikum,

    i hope studying is going well, and i wonder why you removed your last post. I feel an itch to comment on the last two paragraphs of the current post specifically.

    "...so much of the world is prohibited..." please elaborate on this thought. I actually believe very little of this world is prohibited (and that very little falls into the "no-touch" category). By the way, why is it that we should feel limited by our modest choices, isn't that in and of itself an experience? why do we as humans believe that by not giving into our desires we are doing a disservice to ourselves?

    At any rate...
    belief - mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, or validity of something (by now you know who is posting).
    knowledge - the state or fact of knowing
    faith - Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.

    faith is not what Islam is about, as i understand it. Islam is submission. Screw faith. It is giving in to the Lord that is known. Look around you for proof.

    and as a Muslim confidant of yours, times of stress, frustration, confusion are times of clouded judgment that are not true representations of awareness/knowledge of God. Sure, it may be when we remember God, but that is due to our forgetful/ADD nature. An awareness of God pushes us to be better people, not to have God serve as a scapegoat for our uncertainties and deficiencies.

    For instance, some of the greatest thinkers were in search of better explanations for God and His creations (Newton, Darwin, even Einstein). Bring it down to our level, and we see that a slight awareness of God pushes us to pray five times a day amidst a heavy work schedule. It brings people to relinquish their livelihood to help those around them.

    Also, your second paragraph speaks to God's will and then you finish it by discussing anthropomorphic projection of human feeling. Aren't they completely separate thoughts? What does anger, disapproval, etc. have to do with will? or for that matter your (and my) bad work ethic?

    I know you got the whole stream of consciousness thing going, but it's difficult to get an idea of your discussion with Roman, except for the ultimate conclusion that God is difficult to understand. I guess you're right; that's why we have Messengers.

    And yet, as humans we also have the innate desire to create difficulty where there is facility, to establish complexity when there is simplicity.

    ~meh, just scratching, and i didn't even do justice to my thoughts or yours...i don't like this whole commenting bit. i think i'm done.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Not Friendship (Revised)- Repost

It is difficult to be merely a friend to a boy who seems more suitable as a husband than a friend. To reduce a potential life partner to a friend is immature and selfish. Friendship is the not the greatest type of relationship, but it is the safest. Friendship allows you to be intimate without the messiness of other things, like physical attraction, etc. Between friends, there is a warm permanence, a fuzziness that can be called appreciation and gratitude. There is also comfort and trust. Friendship is great if only for the possibility that one can know the beauty of another human being. The possibility of that is worth the difficulty of all else. But sometimes friendship is not enough. Sometimes, to reduce someone to friend when he should be much more is an affront to the opportunity God has presented before you. It is like saying to him, I know that we are amazing together, but we should be friends because I am a dumbass. To reduce him to friend also precludes the possibility of love...
7 comments
Read more

Protection of the Heart

"The pages of the book are like the heart. They turn easily." This is what Irfana told our beginner's Arabic class today. I spent some time with her after class, sharing with her the vague details of my life. She told me, "Sadia you have to protect your heart." Protection of the heart can mean many things. For instance, you should avoid foods that are high in saturated fat. This is common-sense protection of the heart. Then, there is the more significant kind of protection, one in which you avoid engaging in affairs that are potentially harmful for you. I have tried to advocate for platonic relationships long enough (three unsuccessful years), and I will state unequivocally now, THEY DO NOT EXIST. Alhamdullilah. (Rayad you win.) Best practices suggest that being close to a guy--any guy who isn't gay or isn't already married/taken-- means there will be emotional hangups. This principle of protection demands that you anticipate the normal patterns of human...
5 comments
Read more

Re: Your Inquiries

"You confuse yourselves with your actions, even with your thoughts. You barely understand that in order to be, it should not be necessary to act, and that the world changes you far more than you change it." (Malraux, The Temptation of the West, 1961 ) The world consists of wonderful people who enter and exit your life. When you let them enter, your breaths seem more thoughtful, your behaviors more scrutinized, your ideas challenged, and sometimes your brain orgasms from happiness. But when these individuals leave, you experience equally significant things like confusion and hurt. It seems okay to let someone in, someone trustworthy, good, honest, and not concern yourself with the end. As things exist in your mind, there is no harm. Intellectual promiscuity, then, is not so bad. To have intimate, intelligent conversations into the morning is not troubling, either. Sometimes when good people enter, it is not necessary to act, or specifically to resist. When people enter, their ...
6 comments
Read more